World Court’s Advisory Opinion on Climate Change Obligations

• The ICJ delivered an advisory opinion on states’ obligations concerning climate change.

• The opinion, though not technically binding, is considered authoritative interpretations of international law and can influence state behavior.

• The decision has significant implications for the Global North-South divide and climate justice.

• The court ruled that states have legal obligations to protect the climate system and clarified consequences for failing to meet these obligations.

• The court has interpreted all climate treaties to strengthen their operation.

• The court highlighted the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC).

• Developed countries have a legally binding obligation to provide financial resources and technology transfer to developing countries.

• The court rejected the argument that climate treaties are self-contained regimes.