• Home /Exam Details (QP Included) / Increasing economic inequality in India
  • Increasing economic inequality in India
    Posted on November 1st, 2024 in Exam Details (QP Included)

    Increasing economic inequality in India

    • The Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM) released a paper titled “Relative Economic Performance of Indian States: 1960-61 to 2023-24”.
    • The report reveals the economic importance of each state and the average welfare of citizens compared to the all-India average.
    • Maharashtra, the highest contributor to the nation’s economy, has a per capita income of about 150% of the national average.
    • The report points to better performance in the western and southern regions of India, and weaker performance in the eastern States.
    • The growing divide in the country is leading to questions of federalism, with richer states arguing they are not receiving their fair share of resources from the Centre.
    • The report lists liberalisation (1991) as a marker of when southern States began to perform better.
    • The report also points to better performance in coastal areas, including Odisha in the east.

    Investment and Economic Performance in India
    Investment Determinants
    • Investment is a key determinant of output, with higher levels indicating larger economies.
    • Investment comes from both public and private sectors, with the former based on policy decisions and the latter on profitability.
    • Private investment is typically concentrated in developed areas with large markets, such as urban conglomerates like Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad.

    Governance and Infrastructure
    • Infrastructure availability and quality of governance are key determinants of profits.
    • Richer states have better infrastructure and governance, leading to more investments.
    • Better governance also leads to better quality of education and health, leading to more productive labour.

    Private Investment and the New Economic Policies (NEP)
    • The NEP has led to a growing divide across states, with more investment going to richer states with higher profits.
    • The financial sector, which guides investments, has become more important after 1991.
    • The poorer States have a larger share of the unorganised sector, which has grown at the expense of the unorganised sector, fuelling the faster growth of the richer States.

    Threat to Federalism
    • Persistent differentials in economic performance threaten federalism.
    • Policy needs to reverse this trend, reversing the trend of private investment, weak governance, and poor infrastructure.
    • Both the Centre and the States need to improve governance, reduce corruption, and raise public expenditures on social sectors.
    • Shifting focus to the unorganised sector would boost demand and production in the poorer States, attracting more private investment.
    • More government concessions are not needed as they have enough resources to increase their investment.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

     WBCS Foundation Course Classroom Online 2024 2025 WBCS Preliminary Exam Mock Test WBCS Main Exam Mock Test WBCS Main Language Bengali English Nepali Hindi Descriptive Paper